12 March 2003
Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion
Earthquake Research Committee

Seismic Activity in February 2003


1 Major Seismic Activity

There was no remarkable activity. to supplementary reports

2 Nationwide seismic activity by region


(1) Hokkaido Region

*On February 19, there was a M6.1 earthquake at a depth of approximately 220km in the southern Rumoi region. to supplementary reports

(2) Tohoku Region

*On February 16, there was a M5.0 earthquake at a depth of approximately 60km off-shore of Fukushima prefecture. to supplementary reports

(3) Kanto-Chubu Region

*On February 11, there was a M4.0 earthquake at a depth of approximately 5km in the Reihoku region of Fukui prefecture.

*The long-term changes that have been observed since 2001 in the continuous GPS data in the Tokai region, still appear to be continuing. to supplementary reports

(4) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region

*On February 6, there was a M4.5 earthquake at a depth of approximately 15km in southern Kyoto prefecture. to supplementary reports

(5) Kyushu-Okinawa Region

There was no remarkable activity. to supplementary reports

Supplement

*On March 3, there was a M5.8 earthquake at a depth of approximately 40km off-shore of Fukushima prefecture (70km northeast of the epicenter of the event on February 16). The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction. This event occurred at the boundary between the Pacific plate and the continental plate.

*On March 4, there was a M4.1 earthquake at a depth of approximately 30km in eastern Aichi prefecture.



Supplementary Information to the Evaluation of Seismic Activity for February 2003 by the Earthquake Research Committee

March 12, 2003
Earthquake Research Committee

1 Major Seismic Activity

42 earthquakes of M4.0 or greater occurred in Japan and the surrounding area during February (41 events occurred in January, and an average of 46 earthquakes per month have occurred over the past thirty years through the end of 2000). 5 of these earthquakes in February were M5.0 or greater. (5 events of M5.0 or greater occurred in January.)

Earthquakes of M6.0 or greater occurred, on average, 15 times a year during 1998 to 2002. (Over the past 30 years through the end of 2000, on average, M6.0 or greater events have occurred approximately 16 times a year) There was 1 event of magnitude equal to or over M6.0 in February 2003.

The following regions have been noted as having significant seismic activity during the period from March 2002 to the end of February 2003.


-Off-shore of Ibaraki prefectureM5.5 on Feb. 12, 2002 (depth of approximately 50km)
-Ocean area south of IshigakijimaM6.6 on Mar. 26, 2002 (depth of approximately 10km)
-Near TaiwanM7.0 on Mar. 31, 2002
-Ocean area east of Aomori prefectureM5.9 on Oct. 14, 2002 (depth of approximately 50km)
-Off-shore of Miyagi prefectureM6.1 on Nov. 3, 2002 (depth of approximately 45km)
-HyuganadaM5.7 on Nov. 4, 2002 (depth of approximately 35km)

to the text

2 Nationwide seismic activity by region

(1) Hokkaido Region

There is no supplementary information for the Hokkaido region.

to the text

(2) Tohoku Region

There is no supplementary information for the Tohoku region.

to the text

(3) Kanto-Chubu Region

"The long-term changes that have been observed since 2001 in the continuous GPS data of the Tokai region, still appear to be continuing.":

The Pacific side of the Tokai-Chubu region maintains a steady rate with movement to the WNW, consistent with the subduction of the Philippine Sea plate toward the northwest. The results from GPS observations in the area centered on western Shizuoka prefecture, have been showing a trend of moderate change since about April 2001. The trends have continued through February 2003 and show no signs of acceleration.
(This evaluation is in agreement with the views presented at the procedural meeting on February 24 of the Regional Assessment Committee for Strengthening Countermeasures against Earthquake Disaster. (see reference below))

(reference) "Recent seismic and crustal activity in the Tokai region and its vicinity" (Japan Meteorological Agency, Department of Seismology and Volcanology, February 24, 2003)

"In the Tokai region, seismic activity within the crust is at normal levels. The activity within the Philippine Sea plate has been increasing slightly. There have been long-term changes in crustal movements in the Tokai region and its vicinity since about two years ago. There are no large changes in the slow slip on the plate boundary, which is the cause of those long-term changes. So far, there have been no changes of activity which are likely to be associated with the so-called Tokai earthquake."


There was additional activity in the Kanto-Chubu region, as follows.
- On February14, there was a M4.7 earthquake at a depth of approximately 55km in Kashima-nada.
- On February 12, there was a M4.7 earthquake at a depth of approximately 15km under the ocean near Miyakejima. This event had a maximum seismic intensity 4 in Miyakejima. Since the activity during the summer 2000, this is the first time since August 23, 2000 that seismic intensity 4 has been observed in Miyakejima. After this event, the seismic activity increased temporarily, however, at the end of February, it had declined back to normal levels, similar to the state before the event occurred.

to the text

(4) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region

There is no supplementary information for the Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku region.

to the text

(5) Kyushu-Okinawa Region

There is no supplementary information for the Kyushu-Okinawa region.

to the text

Reference 1
Earthquakes that are described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"(Monthly Report of Seismic Activity in Japan) are events of M6.0 and greater, or events of M4.0 and greater (M5.0 or greater off-shore) that have maximum intensity of 3 or greater.

Reference 2
Information that is described in the "Supplementary Information to the Evaluation" includes:
1)Reference information related to seismic activity described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"
2)Recent earthquake activity over the past year related to the events described in "Major Seismic Activity" in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"
3)Seismic activity that has been evaluated, but not included in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" because it is within normal bounds and not prominent.

to the text